Should voters will receive a NOTA (none of the above) election ? - PART - 5

Key Point 41

Hello friends.

In my view that voters should have choice NOTA. As you know that all parties have corrupt leaders. If voters think this leaders party is corrupt with an option to issue voting. But negative is that NOTA entire vote cast that no leader was.

--------

Key Point 42

I think, NB should be an option for voters who dislike the candidate or have no opinion about them, doing so many bad practices prevent over voting rights of the
candidate is also preserved.
---------

Key Point 43

Hello friends,

NOTA In my opinion is a good choice for voters, because most of the political parties give tickets to those candidates who can not woo more votes on the basis of caste. In that case, the right candidate does not get a opportunity to emerge in politics.

If the candidate is not suitable according to the voter then you can use the NOTA choice. If no candidate receives a majority of votes. What If reelection is possible, which is very helpful in choosing the law, the candidate is not damaged.

---------

Key Point 44

Hello friends.

NOTA is an option to increase the percentage of voting and must also remove that is not suitable therefor. There is a disadvantage that re-the choice is again in charge of the economy, in my opinion.

-----

Key Point 45

In my opinion, the current scenario, NB only helps increase number of voters. NOTA So to make a tool of all power in elections. Whether of there must be some change in the law following NOTA.

If NOTA gets maximum number of votes after the election in which constituency must be reprogrammed with new candidates (political party would be forced to give ticket to clean the contestant image).

I know it will involve a lot of financial things, but it's better to have a clean and honest representative for the next five years, which were looted by a moron.

------

Key Point 46

Hello everyone.

According to me, to my knowledge, voters give a new option called "None of the above" is a very bad idea, as it becomes a very serious problem when most people go through this option happen? Election Commission to hold elections again next time. Any body give guarantee that will not happen next? N anybody.

As this option has no logic. Government took a right decision Not the implementation of that button. So finally I give my opinion that government take it as a serious problem and pass some bills like People who are taking offense will not be allowed entry in politics.

Thank You.

------

Key Point 47

Hello friends,

At election time politicians give more tips persons. ie, after winning the election we are providing jobs for sons / daughter, we are developing this condition, etc. After winning in the election, they are not providing the facilities, which have said before in the time of the election.

From time people think next election, which party is better to rule this state, by taking the help of the media was then decide this election which party has to vote on this occasion. Obviously all help people of the country.

---

Key Point 48

Yes no doubt that the NOTA is a good way to allow voters do this as an option, but have problems if this happens. First, if NOTA introduced, as we all know that there is a bad policy, most People went to the NOTA. As a result, at least 90% population would vote for none of the above, leaving only 10% of the vote,
which serves as a basis for judging the outcome of elections. So what in the country?

The second point I would make, as we know is wrong world politics, why do not we citizens accumulate, analyze, decide and appoint a leader and perform other procedures and make him / her help the elections. Because if this happens, we would have an option we like, ie, leading our own act.

This would serve as a good alternative to the NOTA.

---------

Key Point 49

Hai all,

In my view, the NOTA is a very useful option for 100% of the votes. Due to some people who do not work corrupt and statements are leaders getting doubted his promises. Because of this some people will not vote knowing even have a vote permission hereby percent voting is declining. And people who have some money and bottles that comes to voting.

If NOTA is included in the voting system, 100% of the voting will take place and NOTA that if you get more votes, will be an opportunity for re-election suitable candidates. And now a democratic corrupt leader and will not do emerge.

Thank You.

-----------

Key Point 50

Hello friends, as the NOTA is good choice for voters reviews why.

1) One side our Constitution entitles you to choose our leader and same time we have to choose the same between any of which is and selected by the parties and their representatives.

2) NOTA definitely helps eliminate such problems. 

3) And I also think that if the percentage of highest vote will vote NOTA then the parties have to re-elect new candidates that are clear image in society.
author

S.Ganesh,MBA, Phd

HR , Group Discussion Team !

Get Free Email Updates to your Inbox!

www.CodeNirvana.in

Copyright © Group Discussion Topic | New Design | Designed By Group Discussion Team