Universities of India vs foreign universities !

India is known for its education worldwide. Indian universities are providing quality education to students making future leaders.

To

- Indian universities are better than foreign universities such as the quality of education they offer is high.
- Indian universities equip students with the knowledge and the right attitude.
- Many students of Indian universities are being placed in major multinational companies.
- Foreign companies also prefer Indian students for their own businesses.

Against

- Foreign universities offer better technology with a new way of studying.
- The education system is much better than the education system of India.
- In India really have minds, but Indian universities do not know how to convert these minds into something really useful.
- In foreign universities education is based on practicality than theory-based knowledge.
- Students have the opportunity to experiment with their ideas in foreign universities.

Indian universities have a good picture of wide world for the type of education they provide, but how to give that education must be learned from foreign universities. In today's time also Indian universities are focusing more on theoretical knowledge instead of working in the practical application of theoretical knowledge.

Read more

Is republic an ideal form of government ?

"Democracy" is perceived as an ideal form of government and political system. Several countries have adopted democratic form of government. Indicates supreme power lies in the hands of citizens. It is people who elect leaders to represent them. Democracy may De referred to as the orientation and the political system by the people and for the people. The best known form of government carries several advantages, but is also related to some drawbacks. We will discuss the theme, Is republic an ideal form of government?

Yes Support

- The real power remains with the people, as they have the right to elect their representatives. Economic, social and political interests of individuals are best met within the democratic system.

- Democracy is based on the concept of equality. Classifies all citizens of a nation or a state as equality and non-discrimination is made on the basis of caste, sex, religion or property.

- Democracy is recognized for its strength, stability and efficiency. Representatives are elected by the people and therefore relatively stable government is formed.

- Democracy can be called as the first institution to become good citizens. Individuals learn about their rights and duties from birth.

- It is the democracy that can pave the way for revolutionary changes without using violence. People feel as an integral part of the system.

- Democracy is less arbitrary than other forms of government. Limited number of cases as a powerful small minority exploits a marginalized by a large majority.

- Decentralization power is the strength of democracy.

Do Not

- It will not be bad for democracy connected with misuse of public funds and time. It takes time in the formulation of the law and a lot of money spent during the election.

- Not everyone in a democratic nation are aware of the policies of their nation and social circumstances. Some people are not even aware of political issues and, therefore, may choose the wrong leaders.

- Puts more emphasis on quantity rather than quality when it comes to terms of service. Furthermore, any wrong selection can lead to an incompetent government.

- The form of government is manipulated by their selection process, as it can become a victim of election fraud. Furthermore, decisions may suffer due to retaliation or intimidation of voters.

- In adulterated form of democracy, it is almost impossible to control the most use of the small minority.

- A government improperly formed a specific problem every cause there come together to formulate policies for enactment.

- Form autocracy government provides better economic growth compared with the democratic political system. There is no reason to disagree in an autocratic government and therefore nobody can clog the large infrastructure projects.

- There are many countries where democracy is just about money. The United States is a clear example in which millions of dollars are spent on elections and glitzy advertising campaigns. Autocracy not spend money on this type of event.

- Democracy is the main cause behind corruption, which ultimately leads to poverty.

- Democracy leads to illiberal outcomes particularly in countries where there are deep ethnic divisions. For example, Yugoslavia. Slobodan Milosevic left a legacy of over 200,000 people killed in Bosnia and ethnically finished with more than 800,000 Albanians from their homes in Kosovo.

- Decentralizing power in favor of democracy is restricted largely through the control of information.

Conclusion

The simple answer for discussion is one size does not fit all. Democracy can not be called as an ideal form of government. However, it is comparatively better than other forms of government. The role of government is not to govern the people and this is what democracy is all about. At least people have the opportunity to speak their minds or elect their representatives, which is not viable option in other forms of government.

Read more

English should remain the official language of India ?

English is used as an official language in India. Agitation Recently, when PM Modi use Hindi for diplomatic talks, which emerged in non-Hindi states particularly Tamil Nadu. Moreover, recent government proposal to give NDA importance to Hindi language in social networking accounts faced strong opposition by the Tamil Nadu CM and other parts of the region. It is considered a violation of the Official Languages ​​Act 1963 "In the country where most people understand Hindi, Is it okay to continue with English as official language?

Yes Support

• English is a language that is understood by people of different castes and states, and therefore should be the official language of India.

• If any other language is intended to make the official language, all regional parties begin the battle-making at the state level as the official language of India.

• If given priority Hindi then create differences between people who speak not making them feel like second-class citizens.

• Region C is an important part of India which has agitated when Hindi PM Modi used for diplomatic talks.

• The use of the English language is as per the requirement of being part of globalization and there is nothing wrong with that.

Do Not

• Forget all the different castes and religions as the Indians have their own national language is Hindi, and should only be the official language of India.

• It is the duty of the government to take measures so that people around in India can read, write and speak in Hindi.

• Since India has adopted Western culture in many ways. If it continues, there will be personal or better to say the national identity of India.

• In this case, India should learn something from Pakistan Urdu became the official language after the division of the country.

• The small steps are the ways that will ensure that people of different religions have at least one thing in common as Indians.

• English could be used as the official language of India, but is the unofficial lingua franca in South Asia. When it is not official for the region, why make it official for the country.

Conclusion

English should not be the official language of India. It is a domestic issue, and the central government should seriously consider changing the current scenario. Hindi is India, as people in India do not understand Hindi, is a disgrace to the country. Why the regional parties want to make the regional language as official language when Hindi is India. Different regions are part of India. So, must be proficient in Hindi. However, so far, these regions do not understand Hindi; Government has no choice but to have English as the official language of India.

Read more

Should junk food be banned entirely in and around schools ?

Introduction :

Delhi High Court has asked that restricting junk food in schools and surroundings to ensure healthy eating habits in children. The Center for Science and Education had called for a total ban on junk food in schools to prevent children at high risk for obesity, diabetes and hypertension. The high court has ordered the Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) to frame guidelines for making healthy, nutritious, healthy and safe food available for school in India. But the question here is whether this will prevent children from junk food cravings or just restrict while on the school campus? Should not the court to apply total ban on junk food to children across the country?

Yes Support :

1. The future of our country is in the hands of children and we would give them a healthy body and mind to a better and brighter future. Children can not be expected to understand the ill effects these foods have on your health, but the elders do and it is our responsibility to ensure that we stay away all harmful foods. Obesity due to fat on junk food has been to slow the development of children.

2. Diabetes has been an obstacle such in the gay life of children undergoing daily insulin injections. Speaking from personal experience, my brother is diabetic since I was 10 years old; before he could not refrain from junk food because they were available even in school canteens and is now obliged to refrain from them anyway. Medical science has been exceptionally useful for making lives better for diabetics, but the pain of seeing their loved ones enduring the pain of syringes every day is terribly wrong.

3. Children are not the best judge when it comes to health and sugary drinks, processed fat and salt. At home it is the responsibility of parents who do their best to provide nutritious and healthy food for children, but children in schools have the free will to buy what they wanted. Now that schools will be restricted to ensure that children do not get this kind of food within 50 meters radius, expect children to eat healthier than before.

4. Now that's the beginning of summer, soft drinks and ice cream would be the inevitable favorite of children and adults alike. We can not expect children to refrain from cold drinks and ice cream completely, so the total ban can not be called for. The best idea is to keep the number of these may have on the safety limits for children and therefore schools along with coordination of parents and organizations canteen determine the number of children may have these junk foods.

Do Not :

1. The sudden ban on junk food be shocking to those who are already accustomed to this type of unhealthy processed foods. A total ban would be a strict step and could have adverse effects al. Children crave for fries and soft drinks, and if they find available at your fingertips, you may want to explore other areas where we could get these without much trouble. It is a proven fact that his rebellious teenage age wanting to try those things that are not actually within reach.

2. Over the prohibition of the reeds, you need to send a positive message to children about the harmful effects these junk foods on their health. The approach is important as in Britain people do not stop to have processed fat and salt, but are educated about why these are not good for your health. Through workshops and educational campaigns both parents and children should be educated on how these packaged foods can damage your health even beyond repair.

3. It is difficult to refrain entirely from junk food, especially when we have given to have this type of food available at home most of the time. Bust lives have enough lazy parents to pay attention to what they are keeping the reach of children. Even if junk food is banned from school or in nearby areas, there are chances that children have this kind of chips and cookies stored at home. Restrict make parents aware of the harmful effects these processed fats, salt and sugar have on their children and they together can draw limits to this kind of food.

4. Due to the fact that packed food industry is a major contributor to the economy, it is difficult to put a total ban on these foodstuffs. The HC has definitely considered the matter in a sensible way before passing judgment. Lives lost due to cigarette smoking has been increasing for a long long time, but the total ban could not be imposed even in this type of products that are directly harmful to health and the environment. Having a total ban would be asking too much government.

Conclusion:

It is clear that the imposition of a total ban is difficult 500-meter radius which the request was ordered but prohibited on the school campus and surrounding area must strictly enforce. Parents should be informed of this law and should be done to understand the importance of healthy eating, especially in rural areas where food hygiene is a big problem. Government schools helped mostly need to pay attention to this rule because they are the ones who have mostly been ignoring the need for healthy eating and safe for children. Street vendors are usually not seen outside private schools, but schools outside government, there is a huge rush for these unhygienic and unhealthy food.

Read more

If tablets replace textbooks ?

Today's world is a world technologically savvy, where children are more informed about the latest gadgets and technology. Often, the elderly should consult children know about the various features of the mobile or tablet. The weather is changing and it is very important to analyze the ways in which education is delivered to primary school children. In a changing scenario, do you think tablets should take the place of textbooks in high school classes?

Yes Support

• If the tablets take the place of books for children do not have to carry large bags of different books.

• The current generation of children is more attracted towards technology and will learn things openly tables.

• The use of tablets will allow children from diverse backgrounds who stay updated with the latest technology.

• It will be fun to learn and get education on tablets. Children will not feel as if they are forced to study.

• The use of tablets is one of the effective ways to save the environment. There will be no need to cut the trees or opt for the printing of books.

Do Not

• Who said that tablets are an effective way to save the environment? Manufacturing a tablet using 79 gallons of water and produces 66 pounds of carbon dioxide.

• Technological devices should not be used for the long term. Adversely affect the health of people.

• Tablets are an expensive form of education that are not available to children of all sections.

• Parents are not tech-savvy, and they might find it really difficult to guide children in their studies.

• Books for loss or damage does not cost more, but if any tablet case is lost or damaged can be quite expensive for parents.

Conclusion

There is no doubt that the world is becoming more tech savvy and digital. It is not yet the right time to replace books for tablets. There will come a time when it will be possible when the tablets will become very cheap and parents will feel more comfortable with the new form of education. But today it can not be compulsory.

Read more

Women are better managers ?

Art management is a gift for women by nature. Women are born to take responsibility and carry out smoothly. They can easily manage everything without a wrinkle on his forehead.

To

- Women are expected to handle various responsibilities of childhood that makes them a good multitasking.
- I know that managers in major companies or those who are managing their homes, women in all areas manage their work smoothly.
- Its inherent make good managers because they are more patient on the plight and are able to handle situations with his positive attitude and mind calm compared with its partners counter qualities.
- Have the quality of the management of their children and are simultaneously able to concentrate on his career.

Against

- Women are very emotional and soft heart that is considered as a weakness in managing things. They are not practical about situations.
- They may be good at managing things at home, but this strategy can not be applied in the external environment in which they have to work for an organization.
- Can be having all the qualities of management as courage, patience, understanding, etc., but these are not the only key qualities needed to manage a large workforce or other difficult situations.
- Today we have come far, but there are many women who are not given the opportunity to prove their worth or not given enough responsibility to show its potential.
- A woman alone will not be able to handle things if it is not supported by family members.

Everyone is born with some strengths and weaknesses. Similarly women also have some strengths and weaknesses. They have the power to change their weakness on their strengths. If you do that, then there's no stopping it.

Read more

As Mahatma Gandhi deserves to be highlighted in Currency Notes

At the 20th Conference Lalit Doshi Memorial, RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan said that none but Mahatma Gandhi must appear on the currency notes. He said that no doubt there are many great Indians, but no one can match Mahatma Gandhi. Getting anyone else on tickets can be controversial. Do you agree with RBI governor? Do you think that only Mahatma Gandhi should be featured on the currency notes?

Yes Support

• He is the man who led the struggle for independence. It was impossible for India to achieve its freedom without Bapu.

• It takes courage to leave worldly pleasures you have and the work of people who are living a miserable life, Mahatma Gandhi could do.

• Mahatma Gandhi defended the idea that if you want to change the world, change yourself first. He is the one who is respected worldwide.

• There are a number of famous people but they all failed to impress a lot of people.

• Any changes to occur at this time will only create chaos and political upheaval in the country.

Do Not

• There are many other freedom fighters who contributed equally in the freedom struggle of India.

• Bal Gangadhar Tilak who was known as the "Father of Indian Movement" worked as a social reformer and laid the foundations of modern India.

• Contributions from other revolutionaries Bhagat Singh including in the national movement can not be ignored.

• Lal Bahadur Shastri was the world known leader whose efforts to develop India are still admired. Why he does not deserve to be in Indian notes?

Conclusion

It is a bitter truth that nobody is perfect in this world. Taking into account the contributions of Mahatma Gandhi, not bad for him appear in the currency notes, but there are many other great people who have contributed to the development process in India. And in any case, their contributions can not be ignored. If an opportunity arises to provide more people in the currency of India, others can also give them a chance.

Read more

Whatsapp is Necessary or Not ?

A Saudi man divorced his wife after she ignored his WhatsApp messages. The husband said his wife used to spend all their time messaging platform WhatsApp. Because addiction, she even ignored his children. Whatsapp is not new to the market. Even people who are not educated are well aware messaging platform. The messaging application that started as a blessing can turn into a nightmare if not used carefully. It is killing the minds of people. Do you agree?

Yes Support

• Young people are becoming addicted to messaging platform like other addictive substances. It's more of an addiction rather than convenience.

• People are not using the messaging platform to connect with friends or family instead they want to revise their presence in the messaging platform.

• A messaging platform connects people, but WhatsApp is building bridges between people. The application, in many cases, is creating unnecessary doubts in relationships.

• The start and end of the day happens to WhatsApp. And if people do not find any message start feeling low.

• People are so busy using WhatsApp who are unable to differentiate between real and factual relations. One can easily notice that while you are talking all the time with your friends on WhatsApp, that just have an interaction with their immediate family. This also points to the fact that while people have a lot of friends in the network Whatsapp, there is almost no friends available to those who can speak to your heart face to face.

Do Not

• Whatsapp has become the largest messaging application, and it is only because it has allowed people to come closer to each other.

• There are some people who are not involved in any work, and these people are just addicted to WhatsApp, not everyone.

• Whatsapp has allowed school friends and distant relatives to come and speak in one place. It does not kill the mind, it helps people to appreciate the good old memories and relationships.

• In a world where people do not have time to meet friends, WhatsApp has allowed people to share their problems with friends in the messaging platform regardless of time and place.

• Whatsapp is now even used by many businesses and organizations to share important information among employees.

• If used correctly, Whatsapp can help generate new business opportunities and close deals faster existing.

Conclusion

Everything in this world has two sides, one positive and one negative. Using Whatsapp is no different. It is not an application of black or white, but gray application whose pros and cons are decided by the user. People are more isolated than ever in today's world. Some do their best world using the application, and some make themselves more isolated after using this application. In all cases, the balance is the key.

Read more

Hard work or work smart - What is important ?

Work is important to do what leads to the next level of success. The most important question you should ask here is the kind of work that will be at this level: is the hard work and smart work.

To

- Working smart is really the need of the hour.
- Working smart saves a lot of time and make you more organized.
- Through intelligent work can achieve your goals faster.
- Make the smart work saves time for other things you might not get through hard work as exercise, spend time with family, etc.
- Work Smart brings a lot of recognition of the company and to grow in the industry that is.

Against

- Hard work has a lot of time to do the right things.
- It's totally time and exhausting experience, because after doing a lot of work left you with less energy to do anything else.
- Hard work does not allow you to fully utilize your brain and pushes for a more physical work.
- Regarding the determination and persistence hard work is very important, but you can not accomplish much.
- Working hard is not enough, because you might not get the best result of a problem or situation.

I would conclude at the end that working smart is really important because it saves time and allows you to achieve your goals faster than hard work.

Read more

The ban on beef - Is it justified ?

President, Pranab Mukherjee, has finally passed "Bill Maharashtra Animal Preservation" 1995, which prohibits the slaughter of steers and bulls in the state of Maharashtra. There were mixed reactions after 20 years that the old law was passed. When Congress supported the action, NCP did not look very happy about the impact the project could have on people. The bill to ban beef states that anyone found with beef or sale can be imprisoned up to five years and penalized for Rs 10000. Let's see how the act is judicious. If beef was banned in Maharashtra?

Yes Support

- It was going to end the unrest related to the cow and bull slaughter. It will look like a legal and non-religious infringement. The lines are clearly drawn.

- Animal rights would be entitled for such acts.

- Slaughter cows is banned in Maharashtra since 1976.The prohibition extends steers and bulls, which can be slaughtered certificate and permission. An extension of the bill is absolutely justified.

- It is essential to respect the feelings in a pluralistic democracy. Most Hindus consider cows and bulls slaughter as a sin.

- It will encourage people to turn to vegetarian or vegan. It will also encourage state to ban the slaughter of other animals.

Do Not

- A large number of people involved in the industry beef will be unemployed. These people could engage in illegal trade.

- Meat is a cheaper source of protein compared with other forms and prohibition that would deprive the poor section of the same.

- The ban is only in the meat of the water buffalo that the burden of farmers rearing them. It had been an alternative source of income for them.

- There will be losses in the export business as much beef exports will be affected by the ban.

- Several industries like Pharma will be affected because many of their products involve ingredients such as fat buffalo.

- State has no right to impose a certain culture of food in any way in people. If it does, it becomes a theocratic state.

- The livestock economy is hampered. There will be no one to feed buffalo, cows or bulls, which are neither flesh nor useful for agricultural purposes.

- Do not do anything about imported beef. There are many restaurants that use beef Angus US and Australia.

Conclusion

Are you telling people to stop drinking milk just because it comes from a cow? It seems to be the same case here. People should have the right to eat what they like.

Read more

Smartphones are making dumb people ?

Smartphones have completely changed the world of communication, and impact of its introduction is visible in personal as well as professional life. Smartphones come with multifunctional tools and various number of applications that provide countless benefits to companies both large and small. It is the main reason behind the name 'smartphones'. However, there is a group that believes that smartphones are making foolish people. Do you agree with the statement?

Yes Support

- The biggest drawback to the use of smartphones is the adverse impact on people's memory. Today, people tend to forget things due to excessive use of smart phones.

- Previously, people had no problem remembering phone numbers and other tasks to do; However, this is not the case now.

- Useful tools called, including social networking apps, browsing the web fully functional, games and many others without thinking occupy the time of people. Instead of doing productive work, people are still losing valuable time.

- Let's talk in terms of money. A Smartphone can be purchased under Rs 20,000 and above Rs 40000. There is no doubt that the most expensive ones have more features. But over 80% of people do not even know what the features are. They only buy a braggart, and therefore are just silly.

- Smart phones make people dependent or rather say addicted to it. Users are at the mercy of notifications. There is no dividing line between wise use and addiction, resulting in stress and reduced productivity.

- Text messages on smartphones has deteriorated English grammar and spelling of people. Even in formal documents that write well in SMS language or wrong spellings. This is another step towards being a fool.

Do Not

- Smart phones are directly related to technology. How can you make people dumb Smartphone when he changes related technology forcing people to become familiar with the latest changes?

- Smartphones come with several tools to help people increase their productivity. It is a learning tool, even for professionals.

- Information for virtually everyone is available, users use to complete their tasks even when they are moving.

- The smartphone makes people smarter because they can check the products of different companies, compare their features and prices, and can select the best of them. It's good to know what the facts are all related, and therefore is a remote possibility that people be fooled by sellers.

- The smartphone makes people smarter because now use voice communication applications to appear for an examination, test or interview.

Conclusion

Smartphones can best be described as a tool that has an ultimate enigma productivity. On the one hand, force innovation to follow people wherever they go, and secondly, that amplify the negative habits come into the lives of people. Understanding how to reduce bad while focusing on the good is the smart way to use a Smartphone. So, use it wisely, and do not allow anyone to comment 'Smartphone has made you stupid.'

Read more

Western media is very interested as ever in the degradation of India ?

Introduction:

Colonialism ruled the destiny of India after a while and it seems they have not yet made about the fact that India fought for freedom again. It is much as it hurts the ego of the Western world that a country once tied under his government is about to become the world's third largest economy. Even after years of development and advanced changes, the perception of the western world on India is not in the least moved from a country of poor, dirty streets and rapists. Never miss a single opportunity to portray India in bad light, either rape cases or controversies documentary Nirbhaya or offensive. Western feminists continue probing India to discuss the issues of rape and how Indian men are chauvinists left to lose on the streets.

By:

1. A large part of the economy of India for the poor depends on its tourism industry that suffers greatly when Indian cities "rape capital" are cited with the statement that girls are not at all safe in the India. Yes, rape and crime against women is a major problem in our country, but not every man is a rapist and therefore require capital city is unjust violation intent on demeaning, with direct effect on the tourism industry of our country. After the rape incident bus Delhi in 2012, the tourism industry in India has been constantly suffering losses.

2. What is really worrying is how the documentary about Delhi rape was demonstrated. It just captured the views of the convict in prison and his lawyer that was all about how women should behave to avoid rape. This definitely is not like most Indians think. Judging by the opinions of rapists, how can a sensible documentary decide that India is in denial about their problems of rape? This is like blaming all the manhood to issues of rape, but of course meticulously chose India and not the statistics of other countries for showing the number of incidents of rape.

3. Do not make blaming Western media in any form of support rapists or those who disrespect women in any way. All we ask is a little dignity when such news explode at optimal times. Rightly showed that our country witnessed one rape every 22 minutes, but going by the statistics, which failed to show that in Britain the number is "a rape every six minutes," and in the United States is "a rape every 25 seconds . " If this is not the way to intentional degradation, then what is?

4. blame Western media effectively in our Orthodox culture that leads men to feel that dominate over women and have the inherent right to exercise the will and power whenever and with whomever they seem fit. If it is our culture that makes rapists think this way, which in Western countries where freedom is everything and everywhere inspires violations such an alarming rate? The rape is a serious crime against humanity as a whole and the sick minds of a rapist has nothing to do with the culture of the country in which they live.

5. Discuss Slumdog Millionaire and Monsoon Wedding and West knows well that they liked and even give them memorable. That's the way they perceive India to be - poor, backward and poorest to improve things on your own. At a meeting of trade and finance, out of nowhere the third question referred to the Indian Finance Minister Arun Jaitley be violations in India. This is the intentional degradation of weakening business strategies of India as a whole.

6. The teacher Leipzig banned an Indian boarding school student and his reason was this: "hear much about the problem of rape in India, I can not stand." Teachers in Germany refused to teach children in India with similar reasons. It is really alarming that the distorted vision of India that Western media present is affecting the future of the youth of India in many ways. Original version of the daughter of India allegedly had global statistics including but that part was not present when the film was released.

7. After the incident of 2012 rape of our own environment has been caring for news violation as the one who can get coverage on a daily basis. However, the media completely ignored the fact that most of these cases were false FIR made by the family of the girl when the girl escaped or political causes and degrade the rule elsewhere. Judging by the figures, the United Kingdom and the United States 14 percent of rapes are by strangers while in India the figure is less than 1 percent.

8. Mission Mars India cost us less than the total budget of a Hollywood movie, but Western media emphasized that the Indian government is losing money on this kind of extravagant missions instead of focusing on poverty and violations in India. The Western world is still under the belief that the Indians double his head back in shame and never go for research or participate in a world-class company.

Against:

1. Incidents of rape in India have been an alarming increase except bogus, and whether we are affected by what the world thinks of us, we should be working to address this problem rigorously instead of blaming media to be simple.

2. In the age of social networks and the Internet, we can not expect such incidents remain hidden from the world, even if the media does not show that with added spices degradation or so we are told. Attitude of Individuals with regard to women and their dignity must change and will not be wrong to say that it was due to the media that disseminate news about the nation and beyond that drew people to the protests and government to investigate the matter seriously.

3. Take the criticism is something that Indians are not used. We prefer to blame, dig for statistics, and gather incidents from other countries just to show that we are not the only one where the chauvinists monsters roam free.

Conclusion:

Incidents of rape in India is a shame for all Indians, but do not have to make rape incidents middle name for India. The tourism industry in the loss, students admission and employment in Western countries refused, suffering business is not doing any good to the economy of India at all. We need to address the Western media and tell their limits and show that India is no more a backward country, a country on the path of development and we refuse to be trampled.

Read more

If vaccination is compulsory ?

Between December 2014 and March 20 it was reported nearly 150 people in seven states in the US have measles. These people are considered as part of large measles outbreak linked to an amusement park in California. The outbreak probably began a visitor who was infected with measles during your trip. Thereafter, he visited the amusement park that led to measles outbreak Disneyland. An incident like this requires global health authorities to seriously consider immunization. However, by making it mandatory is a great debate. We will discuss the issue, immunization should be mandatory?

Yes Support

• Some diseases like measles is extremely contagious. It can infect 90% of those present around the patient who are not immunized. Immunization may prevent the spread of these diseases.

• If people can remember, polio was one of the most concerning issue in India and the world. However, with proper network established for immunization, the problem is almost eradicated in India.

• The risk of immunization are low, and in the case of many vaccines is limited only to the common symptoms such as swollen glands, fever and pain in the temporary joints. So when there is a low risk, why can not be compulsory immunization.

• Whenever there is an outbreak and people who are not vaccinated are quarantined for at least 21 days, the costs are higher. Also, people quarantined lose time and money. Such problems can be eliminated by compulsory immunization.

• Refusal to get immunized may become costly for the government having to spend so much money and manpower to control the outbreak matter.

Do Not

• It is the personal decision of an individual if he wants to be vaccinated or not. The government can not make decisions about the health of people.

• There are numerous side effects of vaccination. Risks may be low but still the fact that risk there can not be ignored.

• The costs of mandatory vaccination resort again the Government to increase total spending in the country.

• The passage would not focus on the eradication of the disease. Compulsory immunization has to do with the big pharmaceutical and the huge amount of funds that are given to reach an endless supply of inoculations.

• The big problem like autism is said to be one of the major side effects of immunization.

Conclusion

Here, it is important to understand that vaccines are for the good of people and prevent increase the chances of a deadly outbreak in the future. The only goal of vaccination is to keep people safe and well. However, again in democratic countries can not force people to be vaccinated without their consent. Instead of mandatory vaccinations would be better to make people aware of the many benefits of immunization to help them make informed decisions.

The government must evaluate each vaccine on its merit and actual requirements and then put it in your letter. There are many vaccines available in the market that doctors prescribe to make money for the big pharmaceutical companies and earn a profit from them. This commercialization of research and medication has to be stopped.

The important vaccines should be mandatory, but at the same time, the government must have an objective view of what is really important and necessary.

Read more

Sometimes it is necessary and justified for the government to restrict freedom of expression !

In a landmark ruling highlighting the contours of freedom of expression, the Supreme Court dismissed the much abused Section 66A of the IT Act which authorized police officers to detain people for social media jobs declared as "offensive" or "threatening ". Freedom of expression is often believed that one of the most important principles of democracy. Everyone has the fundamental right to express opinions. However, a group believes that it is sometimes necessary and justified by the government to restrict freedom of expression. Do you agree?

Yes Support

• The actual character and testing of each act is based on the circumstances in which it is performed. Therefore, it is justified to restrict freedom of expression, when necessary.

• Restrictions on freedom of expression are as stopping a man from engaging in improper activities. Dissemination of false beliefs and offensive ideas through any media creates a danger of hurting others.

• There is always a need to protect minors from exposure to offensive, obscene, or potentially harmful.

• The Government has a responsibility to protect its citizens from internal and foreign enemies. Therefore, freedom of expression can be restricted acceptably during turbulent times in order to avoid problems.

• Speech Acts prompt physical acts. So political controversy, pornography and hate speech are causally related to the uprising, rape and hate crimes and the need to be stopped.

• Freedom of expression is a right, but every right comes with a responsibility. When people want rights but do not want to exercise them responsibly, the government has to take over.

Do Not

• Freedom of expression is not only a law; It is a mechanism that translates into real and tangible benefits for society to allow people to question the orthodox concepts.

• Placing restrictions on freedom of expression "special cases" kill the whole question, because it is exactly those special cases where established and traditional truth needs to be challenged.
• Real science depends for its development in the continuing challenges to the current situation of always imperfect knowledge.

• What potential problems may arise freedom of expression not repressed; that are less than compared to the severity of the problems resulting from the restriction of an individual to free expression.

• The final results may not always justify the measures. The government may well intend to restrict the publication of information that might be detrimental to your success in the upcoming elections, but in the interest of the people to keep informed about their dirty goals or illegal activities.

• Secret in the name of safety outcomes in unrighteousness. Moreover, society regulates itself and any link between the physical acts and speech acts is false.

Conclusion

It is not necessary that people who commit hate crimes have read hate speech, or people who commit sexual offenses have definitely seen pornography. It is essentially the reverse. The debate clearly leads to a slippery note.
It is a matter of regulating speech on matters that are objectively verifiable and another issue of banning the permissible scope of expression and opinion. The line is very thin and in any case, needs to be protected.

Read more

Losing your virginity before marriage is a big deal !

In the ever changing world, the only thing that people still can not accept openly is losing virginity before marriage. It is a sensitive issue, especially in regions where people are more connected to their culture and values. It is true for countries like India, where still love marriages or live in relationships are not easily accepted. Even teenagers, especially girls consider it great event and cathartic life. The issue becomes very serious and intense at times. Are you one of those people? You really losing virginity before marriage is a big deal?

YES Support

• In this world, all that what can not be recovered after it is lost is regarded as valuable and precious.

• Virginity is not about sharing a physical relationship with another, but is more about sharing trust and belonging with others.

• The first time early mistakes made in the adolescent can be costly for life. Sometimes the damage is irreversible.

• In country like India, where women are seen as God, virginity becomes a certification of features for them.

• When it comes to girls, do not exceed a short time, but then leads to deeper emotional consequences.

Do Not

• People have a habit of making haste of waste, and when something has to happen sometime, why make a fuss out of it.

• Get intimate with anyone is a matter of choice and not be confined to the limits.

• The character can not be judged on the basis of virginity. If that were the case, most of the guys should be tested without character.

• Whenever virginity was talk that is limited to women if men are not bounded to the terms, why should women be like?

• Virginity has nothing to do with relationships or long-term commitment. Had this been the case, most arranged marriages should have succeeded.

Conclusion

Since ages, people are following the concept of virginity is the gift of the two partners after their marriage. However, in today's world, the concept is changing. It's more of a personal preference and choice of what partners want. The only thing is that the decision should be taken with due consideration. In any case, should not hinder happiness and peace in your life.

Read more