Universities of India vs foreign universities !

India is known for its education worldwide. Indian universities are providing quality education to students making future leaders.

To

- Indian universities are better than foreign universities such as the quality of education they offer is high.
- Indian universities equip students with the knowledge and the right attitude.
- Many students of Indian universities are being placed in major multinational companies.
- Foreign companies also prefer Indian students for their own businesses.

Against

- Foreign universities offer better technology with a new way of studying.
- The education system is much better than the education system of India.
- In India really have minds, but Indian universities do not know how to convert these minds into something really useful.
- In foreign universities education is based on practicality than theory-based knowledge.
- Students have the opportunity to experiment with their ideas in foreign universities.

Indian universities have a good picture of wide world for the type of education they provide, but how to give that education must be learned from foreign universities. In today's time also Indian universities are focusing more on theoretical knowledge instead of working in the practical application of theoretical knowledge.

Read more

Should junk food be banned entirely in and around schools ?

Introduction :

Delhi High Court has asked that restricting junk food in schools and surroundings to ensure healthy eating habits in children. The Center for Science and Education had called for a total ban on junk food in schools to prevent children at high risk for obesity, diabetes and hypertension. The high court has ordered the Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) to frame guidelines for making healthy, nutritious, healthy and safe food available for school in India. But the question here is whether this will prevent children from junk food cravings or just restrict while on the school campus? Should not the court to apply total ban on junk food to children across the country?

Yes Support :

1. The future of our country is in the hands of children and we would give them a healthy body and mind to a better and brighter future. Children can not be expected to understand the ill effects these foods have on your health, but the elders do and it is our responsibility to ensure that we stay away all harmful foods. Obesity due to fat on junk food has been to slow the development of children.

2. Diabetes has been an obstacle such in the gay life of children undergoing daily insulin injections. Speaking from personal experience, my brother is diabetic since I was 10 years old; before he could not refrain from junk food because they were available even in school canteens and is now obliged to refrain from them anyway. Medical science has been exceptionally useful for making lives better for diabetics, but the pain of seeing their loved ones enduring the pain of syringes every day is terribly wrong.

3. Children are not the best judge when it comes to health and sugary drinks, processed fat and salt. At home it is the responsibility of parents who do their best to provide nutritious and healthy food for children, but children in schools have the free will to buy what they wanted. Now that schools will be restricted to ensure that children do not get this kind of food within 50 meters radius, expect children to eat healthier than before.

4. Now that's the beginning of summer, soft drinks and ice cream would be the inevitable favorite of children and adults alike. We can not expect children to refrain from cold drinks and ice cream completely, so the total ban can not be called for. The best idea is to keep the number of these may have on the safety limits for children and therefore schools along with coordination of parents and organizations canteen determine the number of children may have these junk foods.

Do Not :

1. The sudden ban on junk food be shocking to those who are already accustomed to this type of unhealthy processed foods. A total ban would be a strict step and could have adverse effects al. Children crave for fries and soft drinks, and if they find available at your fingertips, you may want to explore other areas where we could get these without much trouble. It is a proven fact that his rebellious teenage age wanting to try those things that are not actually within reach.

2. Over the prohibition of the reeds, you need to send a positive message to children about the harmful effects these junk foods on their health. The approach is important as in Britain people do not stop to have processed fat and salt, but are educated about why these are not good for your health. Through workshops and educational campaigns both parents and children should be educated on how these packaged foods can damage your health even beyond repair.

3. It is difficult to refrain entirely from junk food, especially when we have given to have this type of food available at home most of the time. Bust lives have enough lazy parents to pay attention to what they are keeping the reach of children. Even if junk food is banned from school or in nearby areas, there are chances that children have this kind of chips and cookies stored at home. Restrict make parents aware of the harmful effects these processed fats, salt and sugar have on their children and they together can draw limits to this kind of food.

4. Due to the fact that packed food industry is a major contributor to the economy, it is difficult to put a total ban on these foodstuffs. The HC has definitely considered the matter in a sensible way before passing judgment. Lives lost due to cigarette smoking has been increasing for a long long time, but the total ban could not be imposed even in this type of products that are directly harmful to health and the environment. Having a total ban would be asking too much government.

Conclusion:

It is clear that the imposition of a total ban is difficult 500-meter radius which the request was ordered but prohibited on the school campus and surrounding area must strictly enforce. Parents should be informed of this law and should be done to understand the importance of healthy eating, especially in rural areas where food hygiene is a big problem. Government schools helped mostly need to pay attention to this rule because they are the ones who have mostly been ignoring the need for healthy eating and safe for children. Street vendors are usually not seen outside private schools, but schools outside government, there is a huge rush for these unhygienic and unhealthy food.

Read more

GROUP DISCUSSION EDUCATION TOPICS

GROUP DISCUSSION EDUCATION TOPICS

1. Knowledge of Advanced Maths is of no use to human life.

2. Role of AICTE in MBA Education.

3. Should Engineers be banned from going abroad after engineering?

4. TV as a means of education for students.

5. Is schooling a responsibility of the state?

6. Only IITs produce good engineers.

7. Brain Drain is good for the country.

8. Astrology vs. Science.

9. Irrational beliefs vs. scientific beliefs.

10. Practical knowledge vs. Theoretical knowledge.

11. Education in India is elitist in nature.

12. Non-engineers make better managers.

13. Should doctors and engineers be allowed to leave the country?

14. Should students participate in politics?

15. College education in the country today: problems and prospects.

16. Access to higher education should be restricted.

17. Fees for attaining a B.E or B.Tech degree should not be subsidised since most of the better engineers prefer to go abroad or change their fields.

18. Indian scientists have failed.

19. The government should take a stern stand against Brain Drain.

20. Indian scientists and technologists are not up to the expectations.

21. All higher education in India should be privatised.

22. Post-graduate education should be self-financed.

23. Management education is an unnecessary luxury that a poor country like India cannot afford.

24. Standardisation of textbooks is the best tool for national integration.

25. All doctors, engineers and management students should have compulsory two-year national service requirement.

26. Elite institutes like IITs and IIMs should be privatised.

27. Economic progress is more important than social equity.

28. English alone should be used for higher education and administration.

29. India can ill afford higher education.

30. India needs more IITs than ITIs.

31. The government cannot afford to subsidise higher education in the country anymore.

32. We can do without English for now and the foreseeable future.

33. Science has made us less civilised than what we were, we are, and what we ought to be.

34. Privatisation of higher education is essential for the development of India.

35. Common entrance test for all MBA institutes will damage IIM branding.

36. Contemporary education policies should favour technical education instead of management education.

37. Private engineering colleges should be banned.

38. Higher education should be subsidised.

39. Does the IAS have a limited career life with the liberalisation of the economy?

40. The government should stop funding IITs and IIMs and instead provide more funds to primary education.

41. Education and not entertainment is the purpose of the media in India.

42. Should education be privatised?

43. Children without education are a curse to humanity.

44. Public investment in institutes like IIMs - justifiable or not?

45. The present education system perpetuates inequality.

46. Individuals from private institutions are better educated.

Read more